Fulfilling Customer Contentment: The Impact of Passenger’s Preferences and Characteristics on the Use of Chatbots for Booking and Inquiries
Authors: Isidro Karyl E. Namoro, Nathan Zinan P. Catindig, Julia Cassandra F. Dela Cruz, Julius Romeo Naga, Jean Matthew S. Puntero, Ezekiel F. Victor, Marianne Shalimar G. Del Rosario
This study examines factors influencing passenger satisfaction with AI chatbots for airline bookings and inquiries at Ninoy Aquino International Airport (NAIA). It focuses on passenger preferences, chatbot adaptability, data privacy, and the effectiveness of AI chatbots in building trust and satisfaction. The research also explores strategies to enhance chatbot performance while addressing concerns about privacy and emotional intelligence. Data were gathered from 53 passengers at NAIA and four informants: an airline pilot, a cybersecurity expert, and two IT specialists. Using a mixed-method approach, the study combined quantitative techniques such as surveys and descriptive analysis with qualitative methods like thematic analysis of interviews. Key themes included ease of use, privacy concerns, and customer support. Results showed that while AI chatbots improved convenience and efficiency, passengers raised concerns about data privacy and the lack of emotional intelligence, which affected trust and satisfaction. Despite these issues, passengers preferred user-friendly, adaptable, and personalized chatbot features. Demographic factors showed no significant influence on preferences, adaptability, privacy concerns, or chatbot effectiveness. The study concludes that addressing privacy concerns with strong legal frameworks, adding multilingual options, and making chatbots more human-like are essential to improving passenger satisfaction. Recommendations include enhancing chatbot personalization, strengthening data security, and maintaining human oversight to ensure a balanced and effective customer service system.
Introduction
Artificial Intelligence (AI) chatbots have become increasingly important in the aviation sector, especially for handling customer service tasks such as flight bookings and inquiries. This technology helps reduce human intervention, minimize operational costs, and improve service efficiency by offering 24/7 availability and real-time responses. In the Philippines, major airlines operating in busy airports are using AI chatbots to streamline customer service, addressing the rising demand for faster and more accurate assistance.
The study explores key factors affecting passenger satisfaction with airline AI chatbots, focusing on:
Passenger preferences over human agents
Adaptability of chatbots through machine learning and error correction
Data privacy concerns
Effectiveness in building trust and loyalty
Theoretical and Conceptual Framework:
The study is grounded in the SERVQUAL model, which emphasizes five service quality dimensions: reliability, tangibility, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy. These are reflected in chatbot design through features like real-time communication, reliability, personalized service, and data protection.
The conceptual framework outlines four main components of chatbot quality affecting passenger satisfaction:
Preference – Ease of use and convenience over human agents
Learning adaptability – Ability to improve over time via AI training
Data privacy – Secure handling of personal data
Effectiveness – Accurate, clear, and trustworthy responses
Key Insights from Literature:
AI chatbots enhance customer loyalty and satisfaction (Chen, 2023; Yoo, 2022)
Emotional intelligence, error handling, and natural language understanding are critical (Bilquise, 2022; Izadi, 2024)
Ethical concerns and trust play a major role in adoption (Afroogh et al., 2022; Naga, 2024)
Personalized, human-like interaction increases perceived enjoyment and engagement (de Sá Siqueira, 2023; Toader, 2020)
Surveys show that frequent flyers appreciate chatbot efficiency and accessibility (Garcia et al., 2024)
Methodology:
The study used a quantitative descriptive design supported by qualitative interviews, surveying 53 airline passengers across NAIA Terminals 1–4. Respondents varied in age, airline type (legacy vs. low-cost), and flight frequency. The data collection tools included questionnaires and interviews, and thematic analysis was applied to interpret qualitative feedback.
Findings (Respondent Profiles):
Majority were Gen Z (62.3%)
Most flew with legacy carriers (73.6%)
Terminal 3 had the highest passenger responses (41.5%)
Frequent flyers made up 62.3% of the sample
Expert Interviews:
Insights from a pilot, cybersecurity personnel, and two IT specialists emphasized the importance of:
Security and data protection
Human oversight and ethical boundaries
Emotional understanding and user-centered design
Research Questions & Hypothesis:
The study investigates the relationship between passenger characteristics (age, flight frequency, airline type, terminal) and satisfaction with AI chatbot use. It hypothesizes that no significant relationship exists between these demographics and satisfaction metrics (preference, adaptability, privacy, effectiveness).
Significance of the Study:
Passengers: Helps understand how chatbots meet their needs
IT Developers: Informs chatbot design for better user experience
Airline Companies: Offers strategies to enhance customer service
Academics: Provides a foundation for future AI-related research
Conclusion
AI chatbots are revolutionizing the aviation industry by offering scalable, efficient, and accessible customer service solutions. While their use increases efficiency and convenience, their success hinges on continuous improvement in emotional intelligence, data protection, and personalized engagement. The study aims to help airlines and developers refine chatbot systems to meet evolving passenger expectations and build stronger customer relationships.
References
[1] Abdel Rady, H. (2023). Assessing the impact of using chatbot technology on the passenger experience at EgyptAir. Minia Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research MJTHR, 16(2), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.21608/mjthr.2023.247963.1125
[2] Abdellatif, A., Costa, D., Badran, K., Abdalkareem, R., & Shihab, E. (2020). Challenges in Chatbot Development. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories, 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1145/3379597.3387472
[3] Alla, H., Balouki, Y., & Moumoun, L. (2024). The Use of Chatbots as Supportive Agents in Air Transportation Systems. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 826, 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47672-3_24
[4] Arreza, M. K. B. (2022). The quality of service and user satisfaction of airline chatbots. Journal of Business on Hospitality and Tourism, 8(1), 197. https://doi.org/10.22334/jbhost.v8i1.346
[5] Baring Arreza, M. K. (2022). Users Experience On Airline Chatbots. Asia-Pacific Journal of Information Technology and Multimedia, 11(01), 102–114. https://doi.org/10.17576/apjitm-2022-1101-09
[6] Bedué, P., & Fritzsche, A. (2022). Can we trust AI? An empirical investigation of trust requirements and guide to successful AI adoption. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 35(2), 530–549. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-06-2020-0233
[7] Bhavsar, M. (2024, May 8). The role of artificial intelligence(AI) in Data Security. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/role-artificial-intelligenceai-data-security-manthan-bhavsar-smugf
[8] Bilquise, G., Ibrahim, S., & Shaalan, K. (2022). Emotionally Intelligent Chatbots: A Systematic Literature Review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2022, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9601630
[9] Chaves, A. P., Doerry, E., Egbert, J., & Gerosa, M. (2019). It’s How You Say It. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction, 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1145/3349537.3351901
[10] Chen, Q., Lu, Y., Gong, Y., & Xiong, J. (2023). Can AI chatbots help retain customers? Impact of AI service quality on customer loyalty. Internet Research, 33(6). https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-09-2021-0686
[11] Chen, S., Li, X., Liu, K., & Wang, X. (2023). Chatbot or human? The impact of online customer service on consumers’ purchase intentions. Psychology and Marketing, 40(11). https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21862
[12] Cheong, B. C. (2024). Transparency and accountability in AI systems: safeguarding wellbeing in the age of algorithmic decision-making. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2024.1421273
[13] de Sá Siqueira, M. A., Müller, B. C. N., & Bosse, T. (2024). When Do We Accept Mistakes from Chatbots? The Impact of Human-Like Communication on User Experience in Chatbots That Make Mistakes. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(11), 2862–2872. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2175158
[14] Garcia, L. E. G., Landicho, A. J. C., Magbalita, G. C., Maligaya, J. C., Vertucio, N. A. A., Gamoso, R. A., & Peralta, A. E. R. (2024). Airline Chatbots as Communication Tool Towards Consumer Satisfaction on Pre-Flight Assistance Services. Lalaine Ella G.-180. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2024.05.14
[15] Haghighat, N. (2017). Airline service quality evaluation: A review on concepts and models. Economics, Management and Sustainability, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.14254/jems.2017.2-2.4
[16] Halawi, L., Miller, M. D., & Holley, S. J. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Aviation: A Path Analysis. Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research, 33(4). https://doi.org/10.58940/2329-258X.2061
[17] Izadi, S., & Forouzanfar, M. (2024). Error Correction and Adaptation in Conversational AI: A Review of Techniques and Applications in Chatbots. AI, 5(2), 803–841. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai5020041
[18] Kasinathan, V., Wahab, M. H. A., Idrus, S. Z. S., Mustapha, A., & Yuen, K. Z. (2020). AIRA Chatbot for Travel: Case Study of AirAsia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1529(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1529/2/022101
[19] Ltifi, M. (2023). Trust in the chatbot: a semi-human relationship. Future Business Journal, 9(1), 109. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-023-00288-z
[20] National Privacy Commission. (2024). Ensuring Data Privacy and Consumer Protection in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. National Privacy Commission (NPC) of the Philippines. https://privacy.gov.ph/ensuring-data-privacy-and-consumer-protection-in-the-age-of-artificial-intelligence/
[21] Orden-Mejía, M., Carvache-Franco, M., Huertas, A., Carvache-Franco, O., & Carvache-Franco, W. (2023). Modeling users’ satisfaction and visit intention using AI-based chatbots. PLOS ONE, 18(9), e0286427. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286427
[22] ?im?ek, K., & Demirba?, O. (2017). Modeling Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction and Behavioral Intentions in Airline Industry: A SEM Approach. The Journal of International Scientific Researches. https://doi.org/10.23834/isrjournal.341694
[23] Soori, M., Arezoo, B., & Dastres, R. (2023). Artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in advanced robotics, a review. In Cognitive Robotics (Vol. 3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogr.2023.04.001
[24] Thi Phuong Anh, L., & Rajah, E. (2022). Using Chatbots in Customer Service: A Case Study of Air New Zealand. Proceedings: Rangahau Horonuku Hou – New Research Landscapes, Unitec/MIT Research Symposium 2021, December 6 and 7, 161–176. https://doi.org/10.34074/proc.2206011
[25] Toader, D.-C., Boca, G., Toader, R., M?celaru, M., Toader, C., Ighian, D., & R?dulescu, A. T. (2019). The Effect of Social Presence and Chatbot Errors on Trust. Sustainability, 12(1), 256. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010256
[26] Yoo, K. W. (2022). Effects of AI Chatbot and Service Agent on Attitude and Choice Deferral of Recommended Products. Journal of Digital Convergence, 20(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2022.20.3.297